Attorney General Civil Rights Commission on Hate Crimes Update

The State Attorney General's Civil Rights Commission on Hate Crimes will complete its activities for the year on October 24th when the final draft of its report is submitted to the Attorney General.  The Attorney General will release the report to the public in December. Although the report is not quite completed, some of the issues the Commission is addressing have been raised in community forums throughout California. 

In its initial year, the Commission has focused its attention on how to improve hate crime reporting by the community (victims, witnesses, and community organizations to whom victims report), by schools, and by law enforcement. 

Although the Commission heard testimony citing numerous reasons why people do not report hate crimes, it also learned about programs where community agencies and networks are partnering with law enforcement and schools to reach out to affected areas to uncover hate crimes and build trust.  The Commission learned that barriers to hate crime reporting are being overcome in places where anti-hate networks operate. One issue the Commission will have to determine is whether the state should have a role in supporting programs that are proving successful in getting people to report hate crimes.

AB 1785, by Assemblymember Antonio Villaraigosa, requiring schools to report hate crimes was recently signed into law.  However, it is likely that even with the legislation, schools will be reluctant to carry out such a mandate.  In an audience survey at a forum at the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles, more than half of the participants indicated that they would remove their child from a school that reported hate crimes.  The Commission, which included a Department of Education representative, will recommend ways to gain public support for schools that demonstrate an interest in identifying and responding to hate crimes and bias-related incidents.

There is a steady increase in the number of police departments that report hate crimes, but there are still some holdouts.  The Commission's task is to find a way to build incentives for police departments to do accurate reporting and to fill in some identified needs related to law enforcement training, and policy formulation.

Until now, probation officers and jail and prison staff have been largely ignored in efforts to get criminal justice agencies to identify and report hate crimes.  Their training is overseen by entities that are different from those that oversee the training for police officers.  They have rarely been exposed to hate crime response training.  The Commission has expressed an interest in remedying the problem.

Perhaps the most controversial issue the Commission may grapple with is that of establishing procedures for handling and reporting hate incidents and hate crimes when police are identified as the perpetrators.  Despite the incidents relating to Rodney King, Tyesha Miller, and others throughout California, a police officer has yet to be charged with committing a hate crime. 

It is too early to determine just how the Commission or the Attorney General will deal with all of these issues.  Although CAHRO's director has the responsibility for preparing the report, ultimately it is the Commission and the Attorney General who have the final word.

back to top

     next

Back to Spring  2000  Issue

Back to Newsletter page


23041 Avenida de la Carlota
Laguna Hills, CA  92653
Phone: 949 586-6640
kkicpa@juno.com
 www.cahro.org

HOME | ABOUT CAHRO | ACTIVITIES | NEWSLETTER | NETWORKS
LIBRARY | RESOURCES | EMAIL CAHRO | GUESTBOOK | PRIVACY POLICY
CONFLICT RESOLUTION | HATE VIOLENCE/HATE CRIME |
HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSIONS | POLICE-COMMUNITY RELATIONS

 This site is hosted by